Hr NewsStatutory Compliance

A Madras High Court Judgement on EPF

By | S K Gupta,  Advocate, Supreme Court, 

Please find attached the recent Madras High Court judgement for your reference. A summary of the most important features of the case are mentioned below:

BrakesIndia Ltd (Brakes Division), Sholinghur-631 102, Rep. By Its Vice-President (Pers. & HRD)Vs Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, Vellore Rep. By Its Regional Provident Funds Organization.

1. EPF Authority is not entitled to recover either PF contribution or damages from the Principal Employer in respect of employees engaged through Contractors who are registered With The PF Department, Having Independent Code Number.

2.Contractors registered with the PF Department, having Independent Code Number, are to be treated as Independent Employer.

3.However, the liability of unregistered contractors, in the case of Payment Of EPF Contributions or damages, in case of default on his part, would fall on the Principal Employer, if not paid by the Unregistered Contractor,In View Of Clause 30 Of The EPF Scheme, 1952.

[gview file=””]

Show More

Related Articles


  1. of course such as your site but you need to look into the spelling on quite a few
    of your posts. A number turn out to be rife with spelling problems
    and so i find it very bothersome to share with the truth however
    I’ll certainly come again again.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button
%d bloggers like this: