GeneralHr Library

Death of Bell curve- How do you judge performance then?

Source | LinkedIn : By Aditya Adyar

With TCS moving away from bell curve and other companies following suit; the discussion has been rekindled again

With Death Knell for Bell curve; this article explores:

  • What Performance management tools do companies follow now?
  • How are increments, variable pay decided?
  • How does one identify Hyper performers and Poor performers?
  • Challenges in implementation of the new age performance management systems

It looked like Bell curve has been there since the beginning of time; What happened then?

The stakeholders of the process felt that

  • Lot of time is invested in this process and doesn’t help in improving the performance or keeping employees engaged 
  • There is a need for making it more real-time and continuous which actually helps in taking performance to the next level. It shouldn’t be about rating on the basis of past performance. Lot of times, managers have to look into the past  year; meanwhile, objectives, targets of the company would have changed
  • Rating/ranking just becomes a formality without objectivity. Research increasingly showed that forced distribution seeks to foster competition among employees
  • It becomes difficult to fit people in a distribution curve for small teams or high performing teams. With force fitting it sometimes doesn’t reflect actual performance of a person

What are new performance management systems based on:

  • Continuous process instead of annual event
  • Process which helps in development of an individual and not just tool which is used to classify people

 

 

What Performance management tool do companies follow now?

Deloitte has changed its performance management system recently where they encourage regular feedback to be given to reportees. Performance at the individual level, is not about the skills of each team member brings to the table but about their own future actions with respect to that person.

For instance questions asked to managers to judge performance are like

  • Is this person is ready for promotion today ?
  • Given what you know of this person’s performance, would you always want him or her in your team?

These kind of  questions coupled with regular feedbacks help in providing course correction, clarity of what’s required and what great work looks like

Google follows the Objective Key results model where Objectives are set and reviewed once in quarter, with a continuous feedback. OKRs are a generally set in such a way, where it is tough to achieve 100%, but it helps the employee to push the bar higher. Increments and promotions are delinked with OKR discussion.

Companies like  GE, Adobe, Cargill foods also changed to continuous feedback as principle and some of them have come up with Apps to make it easier to record on the go and frequently .

Do they identify Hyper performers and poor performers?

These new age performance management systems also lay emphasis on identifying hyper and poor performers . For instance Adobe requires executives and managers to have regular ‘tough discussions’ with employees who are struggling with performance issues—rather than putting them off until the next performance review cycle comes around.

While some of the companies look at 360 degree feedback, peer reviews, potential, how well employee gels with the team, alignment with culture etc to be a major part of performance assessment .

To better understand

Netflix, believes in continuous feedback , but as a philosophy they believe in disproportionately rewarding hyper performers and weeding out poor performers. Their philosophy can very well be summarized in couple of statements

Sustained A- Level performance despite minimal effort is rewarded with more responsibility and great pay

Read On…

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button