Source | Linkedin.com | BY:Ed Nathanson
Let’s face it – the perception of recruiters by our customers (hiring managers, candidates, client customers) is often times not a great one. No matter how good you are, how many great placements you have made or how great a sourcer you may be, most of our customers think that they can do our job (or at the very least, have opinions on how they would do it better).
I find this both a humorous and an unpleasant reality. Imagine if you went to the Doctor’s office and said “Well, Doc – I appreciate your diagnosis and treatment plan, but have you considered testing for something else and a different treatment plan? I read on WebMD that you went about this consultation all wrong – I would have done it this way.” Alas, we get this as a profession from all around – some of it deserved and some of it no so much.
One area where I do think the criticism of our profession is warranted is in how we set up and manage the interview process. We all understand we are a “people” business, but seem to forget the whole “people” thing when it comes to interviewing. While not emblematic of all organizations – this is what typically happens in most companies when it comes to interviewing:
- Phone screen with Recruiter: A basic check of interest, skills, motivations and talk of potential next steps in the process).
- If the candidate passes this screen, then a second phone screen with the Hiring Manager: A little more than “basic” (but not much) check of interest, skills, motivations and talk of potential next steps in the process.
- If the candidate passes the second screen, then an in person interview with on average anywhere from 4 – 7 people in the department and maybe some cross functional departments as well (a check of interest, skills, motivations and talk of potential next steps in the process) but now with several people all in the same day.
- If the candidate passes the in person interview, some organizations move to potential offer. However, in A LOT of organizations this now moves to a second in person interview round where they meet even more people on the team or cross functional teams and maybe an exec or two (a little more than “basic” check of interest, skills, motivations and talk of potential next steps in the process)
- Offer or rejection status communicated.
Did you notice anything there? If you have eyes and a brain, you noticed that the exact same conversation was had with the candidate roughly 10 times by 10 different people, all trying to cover a lot of topics in 45 minutes to one hour conversations. Sounds productive!
Second – you also probably noticed an excessive number of interviews, and a lot of time invested on both the candidate and employer side. Let’s face it – there are only so many “doctor appointments” someone can take from their current job to interview before things become incredibly inconsiderate and uncomfortable for the candidate. Also – you now have likely spent several weeks scheduling, rescheduling and coordinating these meetings with lots of very busy people on the employer side too. But Ed – we are a PEOPLE BUSINESS!!! Ha ha. You make me laugh, but not belly laugh, more like Joker “Why so serious” laugh.
Look – I get it. As a recruiter, you are handling many moving pieces and usually several job requirements as well. However – I would argue that the interview is one of – if not the most –important process of getting your open requirements to the finish line for all parties involved. With this in mind, it’s time to really re-think how you manage interviews.
What you can do to make your interview process a lot better
My colleague J.T. O’Donnell and I recently discussed this on RecruitHUB with our members, but here are some basic pointers to think about. Yes, different industries, different cultures, different assessment needs will always factor in to the equation. But if you keep these things in mind, you might just end up saving time and that whole “people” thing too.